Mind Vomit by the ikss ~ a journal
Header
Tuesday, Jun. 22, 2004political action items
Navigation
the archives
The last few dribbles...
- -
Wednesday, Jul. 06, 2005
good-bye diaryland -
Thursday, Jan. 13, 2005
Social Security -
Thursday, Jan. 13, 2005
save the arctic refuge -
Tuesday, Jan. 11, 2005
it's surreal -
Tuesday, Jan. 11, 2005
the latest entry
Contact the ikss
~ the ikss guestbook ~
email the ikss
notes to the ikss
New here? Start here
The Usual Suspects (Cast)
the ikss Mission Statement: Please Read
the ikss bio
the ikss profile, including favorite diaryland links
somebody out there loves me
�Once in his life, every man is entitled to fall madly in love with a gorgeous redhead�
-Lucille Ball
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
--Theodore Roosevelt, 1918
REGISTER TO VOTE
"The time is always right to do what is right"
- Martin Luther King, Jr.
"The "seven social sins": Knowledge without character,
Science without humanity,
Wealth without work,
Commerce without morality,
Politics without principles,
Pleasure without conscience,
Worship without self-sacrifice."
--Gandhi
"We have not inherited the world from our forfathers -
We have borrowed it from our children."
--Kashmiri, proverb
A request for information on how much oil and gas private corporations are extracting from taxpayers' public lands has been stymied by the Bush Administration's refusal to comply with the spirit of the federal Freedom of Information Act.
The request for public information was filed by the nonprofit Environmental Working Group (EWG) last March. EWG is seeking to determine the quantity and value of oil and gas extracted from public lands in the U.S. EWG's investigation also seeks to ascertain the environmental impact of extracting oil and gas from land leased to private corporations by the U.S. Department of the Interior, said Arianne Callender, general counsel for EWG.
"We are hoping to analyze the value of the Department of the Interior's oil and gas activities as it compares to other uses of the land," Callender told BushGreenWatch. "We hope to find out what these leases are really worth, and if there is potential harm to our natural resources."
But the federal government's response to the request imposes a "cost-prohibitive" $6,500 fee and asserts that it would take 200 hours of staff time to compile data, pushing the release of the information to well past the end of the year � and, notably, past the upcoming presidential election. [1]
In return for the use of public lands, companies that extract oil and gas pay the government a royalty of 12.5 percent of the value of what they remove, said Dusty Horwitt, an analyst for EWG. Without knowing how much each company extracts, it is impossible to determine the value of those leases to the public.
The agency's response denies EWG a waiver of the $6,500 fee (although a waiver is standard practice for public information requests when the information will be broadly disseminated to the public) � on the grounds that the public will not be sufficiently interested in the subject, and that the information is allegedly already available to the public. In addition, the acting Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) officer disagreed with EWG's "view that these programs are a giveaway of public resources." [2]
"It's difficult to distinguish which of these arguments is the most specious and irrelevant," argues EWG President Ken Cook, in his written appeal of the decision.
Cook points out that, at a time when gasoline prices (and federal deficits) are skyrocketing, there is perhaps no topic less likely to be ignored. "When 59 percent of Americans surveyed in the most recent USA Today/CNN/Gallup poll said gas prices would cause financial hardships for them this summer, we are hard pressed to think of an issue that the public cares more about than oil and gas prices and supplies," Cook wrote.
Cook also refutes the assertion that the information is already available, stating that the data is not available in a form that makes it possible to determine "where the oil and gas are coming from or who is paying for them."
He especially takes issue with Acting FOIA Officer Ralph L. Johnson's argument that he can block access to data because he doesn't like EWG's assessment of "how the oil and gas leasing system works."
"Taxpayers paid to compile these data, and they are not Acting FOIA Officer Johnson's personal property," Cook wrote. "He doesn't get to decide who will or who won't get access to them, and his interpretation does not supersede the public's right to know."
EWG's appeal of the decision is pending before the Department of the Interior.
[1] EWG letter, Jun. 2, 2004.
[2] Ibid.
~~~
Will Bush re-appoint W. David Hager? Not if we can help it.
He's baaaaaack! You might remember W. David Hager - President Bush's first choice to head a powerful FDA panel regulating women's reproductive health. Protests from activists like you dissuaded Bush from making Hager the head of the committee, but Bush still appointed this anti-choice zealot to this critically important committee.
Just as we feared, Hager has put his personal anti-choice views ahead of science and public health. He voted to oppose the over-the-counter sale of the Plan B� emergency contraception, despite overwhelming support by the medical community and his fellow committee members. Hager is the doctor who required a demeaning "ethical lecture" before prescribing birth control to unmarried women, wouldn't provide IUDs because he considered them a form of abortion, and wrote a book recommending Scripture readings to treat premenstrual syndrome.
Hager's term on the panel ends June 30, along with that of another anti-choice activist, Susan Crockett. Bush hasn't said yet whether or not he'll reappoint them - and he'd prefer to be able to do it without attracting a lot of attention. Your assignment is not to let him get away with it. Sign this petition by clicking here and keep Hager and Crockett's anti-choice ideology far away from decisions involving women's reproductive health.
Join with NARAL Pro-Choice America and sign this petition to express your opposition to W. David Hager's dangerous blend of politics, science, and ideology.
Late-breaking news about the FDA's rejection of making EC available over-the-counter:
Today the Washington Post confirmed our suspicions that the FDA put anti-choice politics ahead of public health when it rejected an application to make the Plan B� emergency contraception available without a prescription. The Post reports that senior FDA scientists believe that the reasoning used to reject the application is "unfounded" and biased. Read the full story here (free registration required).
last / next
~~~~~~~~~~~peace, love and smooches~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Don't know why you'd wanna, but on the off-chance you may feel tempted to steal any of my words and claim them as your own, please be advised:
All material
Copyright 2002-2005, Howl-at-the-Moon Words
***DISCLAIMER: These are my thoughts and my thoughts alone. If you know me in my "real life" off the net and have come across this page purely by accident, please keep in mind that you were not invited here and I would suggest you leave this page now. However, should you choose not to do so, please be warned that reading my thoughts here is not an invitation to discuss them off-line. You may discover things you do not know about me and may not like very much. Such is life. Again, this is MY space and I will use it as I see fit. If you are offended by anything here, well that's pretty much your own fault at this point.
I say all of this with love, of course, but there it is.
